Skip to main content

Rules of Procedure of the Administrative Tribunal

The Administrative Tribunal

We are the last resort of the conflict resolution system for employment related disputes at the IDB Group. Learn more about our role, composition, previous Judgments and resources available.

Contact us
Administrative Tribunal

(As amended on September 22, 2014, on November 6, 2019, on June 19, 2020, on November 9, 2022 and on May 1, 2024)

The Administrative Tribunal of the IDB Group has adopted on May 1, 2024 new Rules of Procedure to streamline, improve clarity and enhance the efficiency of its proceedings.

Please consult the explanatory table for a concise overview of the amendments made and for an article-by-article comparison between the current Rules of 2024 and the previous Rules of 2014.

You can access here to the full text of the previous Rules of Procedure of September 22, 2014.

 

*The Titles of the Articles are for reference only.

Article 1: Decisions and Quorum

Unless otherwise provided in these Rules, the Tribunal or the Panel assigned under Article 11 hereunder, shall take all decisions by a majority of its Members (“Members”). In the case of the Tribunal, a quorum of four Members of the Tribunal is required; for the Panel, all three Members are required. In the case of a tie vote of the Tribunal, the President shall have the decisive vote.

 

Article 2: Officers
  1. Election of President and Vice-President. Within the first semester of each calendar year, the Tribunal shall elect a President of the Tribunal (“the President”) and a Vice-President of the Tribunal (“the Vice-President”), who will respectively hold office from July 1st of that year until June 30th of the following year, unless in the meantime either ceases to be a Member of the Tribunal. 
  2. Duties of the President. The President shall represent the Tribunal in all institutional matters and shall preside over its meetings. The President shall also supervise the work of the Executive Secretariat. When the Tribunal is not in session, questions arising over the processing of a case shall be decided by the President or, if a Panel has been appointed in accordance with Article 11, by its Presiding Member. 
  3. Substitution of a Disabled or Unavailable President. If the President is unable to perform his or her duties, they shall be performed by the Vice-President. If the Vice-President is unable to serve, the duties of the President shall be performed by the longest-serving Member and, in the event of equal length of service, by the older Member.
Article 3: Executive Secretariat
  1. Executive Secretariat. The Tribunal shall have an Executive Secretariat headed by an Executive Secretary designated under Article V(1) of the Tribunal Statute (“the Statute”). 
  2. Functions of the Executive Secretary. The Executive Secretary shall be responsible for the administrative work of the Tribunal and the organization, custody and care of its documents and files. In particular, the Executive Secretary shall: 
 
a. Make for each case filed with the Tribunal a case file to record all actions taken in processing a complaint. The Executive Secretary shall also record the dates on which the office receives and transmits every document related to a case, as well as the dates on which the Parties receive such documents, and the means through which they were delivered;

b. Receive and transmit all briefs and documents and provide all notices hereunder;

c. Keep all written records of proceedings, numbering consecutively each page of the briefs and documents added to each case file. Regarding the Complaint and Answer briefs, as well as other briefs, the Executive Secretary may, if found useful, note the time of day when they were submitted;

d. Serve as clerk to the Tribunal and as such, attend all Hearings of the Tribunal and sign the records and judgments;

e. Take such action as necessary, under the direction of the President, to expedite the proceedings;

f. Ensure that the Statute and Rules of Procedure, as well as its judgments, are published and distributed among Respondents’ staff;1 and

g. Perform all functions assigned by the Tribunal or its President, as appropriate, in order to assist the Tribunal in the discharge of its functions.
 

1 The term “Respondent” refers to either the Inter-American Development Bank or the IDB Invest, formally known as the Inter-American Investment Corporation referenced in Article I of the Statute.

Article 4: Sessions
  1. Convening of Sessions. The President shall convene the sessions of the Tribunal, and the Presiding Member of a Panel shall convene its sessions, by giving advance notice of at least 30 days2 to all those required to attend indicating the matters and subjects to be considered. 
  2. Location. The Tribunal as well as its Panels shall hold their sessions at Respondent’s principal office unless the President or the Presiding Member, as the case may be, considers that the efficient conduct of the proceedings warrants holding a session elsewhere. Participation in a session may be by means of teleconference, videoconference or similar communications equipment allowing all persons participating in the meeting to hear each other at the same time and to have simultaneous interpretation, when necessary. Participation by such means shall be known as “virtual participation” and constitutes attendance for the purposes of a quorum and voting on decisions. 
  3. Inability of Members to Participate. Members who are unable to participate in a session, as well as persons who can only participate virtually, shall so advise the President immediately through the Executive Secretary.

2 Unless otherwise stated, all references to “days” in these Rules are calendar days as specified in Article 21(2).

Article 5: Disqualification and Recusal
  1. Grounds. The following circumstances constitute disqualifications from Hearing a particular complaint: 
a. Having an interest in the matter;

b. Having been a counselor, advisor, attorney, expert or witness in the matter either prior to or during the administrative procedure or in the course of the judicial procedure;

c. Being a relative of any of the Parties within the fourth degree of consanguinity or second degree of affinity; or

d. Any other grounds for disqualification stated in the Tribunal’s Code of Judicial Conduct.3
 
  1. Recusal. When a Member believes there is a circumstance which prevents that Member from the taking of an unbiased and objective decision, such Member shall recuse her/himself from hearing the case and shall communicate the decision to the President. 
  2. Challenges. The Parties may challenge the participation of a Member for any of the reasons stated as grounds for disqualification, as well as for any of the following: 
a. Being a close friend of or manifestly unfriendly to any of the Parties;

b. Being a relative of any of the counselors, advisors, attorneys or representatives of a Party within the fourth degree of consanguinity or second degree of affinity; or

c. Having expressed an opinion other than in conversations within the Tribunal on a specific case currently before the Tribunal.
 
  1. Form and content. The challenge shall be filed in writing as soon as the Party concerned becomes aware of the grounds for the challenge. The challenge shall include the relevant evidence.
  2. Procedure. When the challenge has been filed, notice shall be given to the challenged Member and to the other Party, each of whom will have 15 days to file comments. Thereafter, in the event the Member declines to withdraw, he/she shall have 10 days to communicate in writing his/her reasons to the President. The President shall then issue a ruling within 10 days. If the challenge concerns the President, the matter will be decided by the Vice-President. If the challenge is upheld, the Member challenged shall be barred from hearing the case.

3 The Code of Judicial Conduct is available on the Tribunal’s website.

Article 6: Contents of the Complaint and Other Filings (4)
  1. Formal Requirements of the Complaint. The Complaint shall be written with sufficient clarity so as to enable the Tribunal to ascertain what Complainant states and requests, and shall contain: 
a. The name, nationality, address, contact details, and occupation of Complainant, and if applicable, profession of his/her representative, as well as the nature of that representation

b. The identification of the office or unit to which Complainant belonged at the time of the decision challenged, the date and type of appointment or contract, the title and job description of the position held at the time of the decision challenged, and the official or officials who took part in the decision;

c. A clear statement of the facts on which the Complaint is based. Each fact or set of circumstances making a single point shall be set out in a separate paragraph, as far as possible

d. The legal grounds for the Complaint, in particular: (i) a listing of the terms of employment, rights and duties alleged to have been violated, or the provisions of the Agreement Establishing Respondent or Respondent’s written and approved Policies, Rules and Regulations, or the Rules and Regulations of Respondent’s Boards of Governors, Boards of Executive Directors, the Administrative and Personnel Policies, or the Staff Retirement Plan allegedly infringed; and (ii) an explanation of the manner in which each violation or infraction is alleged to have taken place;

e. A clear and precise listing of the remedies requested, including rescission of the challenged decisions and compensation claimed;

f. If Complainant believes that the contested decision would cause Complainant irreparable harm, a request for the suspension of the contested decision, which clearly identifies the alleged harm that the decision would cause, and the reasons Complainant believes it is irreparable; and

g. Complainant’s signature and, where applicable, that of his/her representative or attorney.
 
  1. Documents to be Attached. The contested decision, as well as documents cited by Complainant in support of the claims shall be attached to the Complaint as annexes, in the original or in the form of a true and full copy, unless part of the document is obviously irrelevant. Complainant shall provide an index of the annexes attached, which shall be numbered sequentially.
  2. Request for Production of Documents. In the Complaint, Complainant may request the Tribunal to order the production of documents that may be possessed by Respondent, which Complainant does not have, and which Respondent has refused to produce upon Complainant’s request. Complainant shall include a statement explaining why the documents requested may be essential for proving the material facts alleged in the Complaint. After the filing of Respondent’s Answer, the President may issue an order on this request, which may include an extension of the time for filing the optional Reply under Article 10 below. 
  3. Proof of Administrative Remedies. Without prejudice to Article 8(1)d, Complainant shall attach a Certificate that the required administrative remedies have been concluded. 
  4. Power of Attorney for Complainant. Power of attorney executed in connection with a Complaint brought before the Tribunal, as well as the appointment of legal counsel, may be certified by the Executive Secretary or by a notary public. 
  5. Filing of the Complaint. The Complaint with its annexes shall be filed electronically, including by e-mail, with the Office of the Tribunal’s Executive Secretariat (tribunal@iadb.org) or, if this is not practicable, by mail to the Office located at Respondent’s headquarters. If Complainant lives in a place other than Washington, D.C., the Complaint may be filed, with its annexes, at Respondent’s nearest office, by registered mail or by courier. In those cases, the date shown on the note acknowledging receipt by Respondent’s office, the postmark date or the receipt date of the courier shall be the date of filing. 
  6. Disposition of the Request for Suspension. After hearing Respondent on the request for suspension under Article 6(1)(f) above, the President may grant the request provided that irreparable injury is found.

4 In Article II of the Statute, the Complaint is referred to as the “Application” and Complainant is referred to as the “Applicant.” The filing of the Complaint shall be electronic as required under Article 25(1).

Article 7: Compliance with formal requirements and Notice to Respondent
  1. Irregular filing. If any of the requirements of Article 6 are not met, the Executive Secretary shall point out the irregularities to Complainant and fix a time limit of not fewer than 30 days to submit a corrected Complaint. If Complainant complies, the Complaint shall be deemed to have been filed on the original date. Otherwise, with the approval of the President, the Executive Secretary shall notify Complainant that the Complaint is regarded as not having been filed. 
  2. Notice of the Complaint. Within seven days from the filing of the Complaint or the completion of the corrections referred to above, the Executive Secretary shall serve on Respondent’s General Counsel a copy of the Complaint and its annexes.
Article 8: Admissibility
  1. Admissibility of Complaint. A Complaint shall be admissible only in the following cases: 
a. When the Complaint is filed with the Tribunal within 120 days of the date of exhaustion of all other remedies required within the formal system for the resolution of employee grievances, as provided by Respondent’s policies as conditions for access to the Tribunal, and such remedies are exercised within their respective time periods;

b. When the Complaint concerns policies interpreted by a Plan Administration Committee, such Complaint shall be admissible only from a final decision of that Committee, and such Complaint is filed with the Tribunal within 120 days from notice of such decision to Complainant;

c. When the Complaint contests a decision of the Administration imposing a disciplinary sanction as contemplated in Respondent’s Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct and in its Procedures, or Respondent’s other relevant ethics and disciplinary codes or policies, and such Complaint is filed with the Tribunal within 120 days from notice of such decision to Complainant;

d. If Respondent unreasonably refuses to provide the Certificate that the administrative remedies have been exhausted or if Respondent fails to answer a request within the formal system for resolution of grievances within 120 days following the request, thereby preventing Complainant from exhausting the remedies set forth in Article II(2) of the Statute, the Tribunal may waive the requirement to present the Certificate referred to in Article 6(4); and

e. When the jurisdictional requirements set out in Article II(1) of the Statute are satisfied.
 
  1. Extension of the Time to File. The 120-day time limit established above may be extended to one year if the heirs of a deceased employee or the trustee of an employee who is not in a position to manage that employee’s affairs, file the Complaint in the name of said employee.
     
  2. Motion to Dismiss on Account of Inadmissibility. Upon Respondent’s motion to dismiss the Complaint for reasons related to admissibility, or on the President’s initiative, the Executive Secretary shall grant Complainant 15 days to present observations on the admissibility of the Complaint. Once the comments are received, or after those 15 days are passed, the President upon consulting with other Members by way of the formation of a Panel or the entire Tribunal, shall rule on the matter. If the President rules the Complaint inadmissible, the Executive Secretary shall promptly notify the Parties and the decision shall be filed for the record. If the President rules the Complaint is admissible or decides to join the inadmissibility motion to the merits, the Executive Secretary shall notify the Parties and the consideration of the Complaint shall proceed in accordance with the procedure set out in these rules.
Article 9: Answer

Respondent shall have 30 days within which to file an Answer to the Complaint. The Answer shall satisfy, mutatis mutandis, the formal requirements of Article 6. If the Answer fails to meet those requirements, Article 7 shall apply to the Answer.

Article 10: Optional Reply and Rejoinder
  1. Reply. Within seven days from the filing of the Answer, the Executive Secretary shall transmit a copy and its annexes to Complainant, who may submit a Reply within 15 days. 
  2. Rejoinder. The Reply shall be transmitted in the same manner to Respondent, who may in turn submit a Rejoinder within 15 days. 
  3. Purpose. The Reply and the Rejoinder under this Article are intended merely to confirm, clarify, or rectify the statements on questions of fact and of law set out in the Complaint and the Answer. Consequently, they may not include new petitions or change the issues disputed in the Complaint and the Answer other than those that reasonably arise out of documents produced by Respondent pursuant to an order issued under Article 6(3) above.
Article 11: Panels
  1. Appointment. When the procedure set out in Articles 6 to 10 has been completed or the relevant deadlines have expired without a Reply or a Rejoinder having been filed, the President shall, unless the particular case is deemed to involve exceptional circumstances that merit consideration by the full Tribunal, appoint a Panel of three Members to hear and decide the case. At the same time, the President shall designate the Member who will preside over the Panel. Upon the request of any two Members of the constituted Panel, the President, after consultation with the Presiding Member, may decide to refer the matter to the full Tribunal. 
  2. Exceptional Circumstances. The exceptional circumstances referred to in Section 1 above, include, among others, the nature of fundamental rights involved, the number of Complainants, the novelty of the issues in dispute or where an earlier precedent may need to be reconsidered, the importance and impact of the decision to be adopted by the Tribunal, or any whistleblower activity alleged to have led to reprisals against Complainant. 
  3. Definitions. For purposes of these Rules: (i) the term “Presiding Member”5 refers to the Member so designated by the President, or if no Panel is formed, to the President; and (ii) the term “Tribunal” refers to the full Tribunal, or if a Panel is formed hereunder, to that Panel.

5 In Article III(4) of the Statute, the Presiding Member of a Panel is referred to as the “Chairperson” of the Panel.

Article 12: Case Management
  1. Pre-trial Orders. Within 30 days following the filing of the last optional pleading filed under Article 10, or within 30 days following the filing of the Answer, the Presiding Member, after consulting with the other Members of the Tribunal or of the Panel, as the case may be, shall make such orders and give such directions for the expeditious hearing of the Complaint. Those orders may include, among others: 
a. An order for the production of additional evidence requested in the pleadings, including testimony by way of signed statements to be verified at a Hearing;

b. An order establishing the date of a Hearing for the receipt of oral testimony and for the verification of testimony already proffered in writing, no later than 120 days following the date of the Pre-trial Orders; and 

c. An order establishing a date for the presentation of Closing Argument, which if oral, will normally take place during the same session for which the Hearing is scheduled or if in writing, no later than 15 days thereafter.
 
  1. Subsequent Orders. The Presiding Member, after consulting with the other Tribunal Members, may at any time during the proceeding: 
a. Order the further production of evidence, supplemental briefs, including points of law and legal authorities on the issues raised in the pleadings;

b. Abridge or extend the time limits set in the orders issued in accordance with this Article, unless otherwise not permitted under other provisions in these Rules or the Statute;

c. Except as otherwise provided in Article 13(4)(e) below, receive and rule upon any motion presented by a Party pertaining to case management; however, before doing so, the Presiding Member shall give all other Parties a reasonable opportunity to oppose or otherwise comment on the motion; and

d. Issue such other orders as the Presiding Member considers pertinent to the expeditious disposition of the case. 
Article 13: Evidence
  1. Admissibility. Only evidence that is relevant shall be admitted, and evidence considered inherently unreliable may be excluded or given minimal weight. For example, inadmissible evidence may include illegally obtained evidence, and unreliable evidence may include inter alia certain kinds of hearsay normally excluded under customary rules of evidence, and documentary evidence of doubtful authenticity. 
  2. Proffering of Evidence. In accordance with Articles 6(2) and 9, the Parties shall include with their initial pleadings all relevant documentary evidence, including signed witness statements. 
  3. Refusal to Present Relevant Evidence Requested by a Party. The refusal without good cause of a Party to present relevant evidence in its possession on a material fact requested by the other Party may cause the Tribunal to declare inadmissible other evidence presented by the Refusing Party relative to that fact, and to decide that question of fact in favor of the Requesting Party. A Party which seeks to rely on legitimate grounds to refuse to produce such evidence may seek from the Presiding Member a Protective Order or may submit an excised version of the evidence requested, together with a detailed explanation of the reasons for the protection sought and/or the excisions. 
  4. Testimonial Evidence and Hearing. 
a. The taking of oral testimony shall be in a Hearing before the Tribunal or one or more Members designated by the Presiding Member and may be virtual and/or at a location requiring the physical presence of the witnesses and the Parties and/or their representatives.

b. All oral testimony shall be taken under oath and subject to cross examination and questioning by the Tribunal; written testimony shall be affirmed under oath before a notary public or the Tribunal, as the Presiding Member may require, and if ordered, subject to cross examination and questioning by the Tribunal.

c. Unless otherwise dictated by the Presiding Member, the oath shall be: “I declare and swear under oath, that the testimony I am about to give is entirely true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.”

d. All expert testimony, written or oral, shall be accompanied by a statement of the witness’ qualifications demonstrating recognized expertise in the relevant subject matter. The testimony shall be admissible only if based on (i) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge; (ii) sufficient data, facts, and reliable methods and principles; and (iii) a reliable application of those methods and principles to the material facts of the case.

e. The Presiding Member shall determine the sequence of witnesses to be heard and shall allow the Parties and the Members to examine the witnesses on their testimony and other evidence proffered. The Presiding Member shall rule on any objections raised by the Parties regarding the conduct of the Hearing, the questions presented to the witnesses, and the admissibility of the testimony. Objections to testimony not raised before, at the time, or immediately after it is given may be overruled as extemporaneous.

f. The Executive Secretary shall duly record oral testimony and timely issue a transcript or recording to the Tribunal and the Parties. 
Article 14: Closing Argument
  1. Option for Oral Argument. At the discretion of the Tribunal, Closing Arguments may be either oral or written. If either Party requests an Oral Argument, the request must be presented no later than 15 days after the last pleading under Article 9 or Article 10, as the case may be; however under extraordinary circumstances the Presiding Member may consider a motion for Oral Argument presented no later than 30 days prior to the date of the Hearing. 
  2. Procedure for Oral Argument. 
a. Except as otherwise provided in Section d. below, Oral Argument shall be recorded and public insofar as the Executive Secretary shall provide for a suitable site available and/or in time virtual broadcasting for attendance by interested IDB Group staff members and members of the Board of Directors and Governors of the IDB Group.

b. Each Party, beginning with Complainant, may address the Tribunal for up to thirty minutes. Following Respondent’s presentation, each Party may make a reply of up to ten minutes in the same order.

c. The Members may ask the Parties questions, during or after their presentation.

d. The Tribunal may determine that the benefits of holding any part of the Oral Argument in public is outweighed by the substantial harm most likely to be suffered by a Party or other person directly involved in the proceeding, and temporarily adjourn the public Hearing to hear that part of the Oral Argument in private session.

e. The Presiding Member shall direct the Hearing for Oral Argument and may shorten or lengthen the time frames contained in this Article.
 
  1. Procedures for Written Argument. 
a. In the event there is no Oral Argument, each Party shall present its Written Closing Argument no later than 15 days following the evidentiary Hearing. In the event there is no Hearing, they shall present their Closing Arguments upon the date indicated in the Orders issued under Article 12(1) or in any subsequent order issued by the Presiding Member

b. Closing Arguments shall not exceed 15 pages in length, double spaced.

c. The Executive Secretary shall, within seven days following receipt of each Party’s Closing Argument, serve a copy on the other Party. Each Party shall have seven days to file with the Tribunal its written observations on the other’s argument, no more than seven pages in length, double spaced.

d. The Tribunal may at any time submit specific questions to each Party regarding its Closing Argument and reply, with specific instructions for answering them in writing.
Article 15: Judgments
  1. Schedule for Completion and Notification. Following the termination of the procedures specified in Article 14 above, the Presiding Member shall establish a date for the completion and notification of the Judgment. Except in extraordinary circumstances, that date shall be no later than 120 days following the termination of those procedures. 
  2. Drafting and Deliberations. The Presiding Member may also establish a schedule of Tribunal meetings and may assign to one or more Members the responsibility for preparing all or parts of a working draft opinion for the Tribunal’s consideration. The Executive Secretary shall assist the Members with the drafting of the statement of facts and procedural history of the case, arranging and coordinating meetings for discussion of drafts, legal research, and producing and circulating drafts for review and final distribution. 
  3. Content of the Judgment. The Judgment shall state the findings of fact and the legal basis for conclusions reached and remedies, if any, ordered. 
  4. Concurring and Dissenting Opinions. Any written and signed concurring or dissenting opinions shall be appended to the Judgment and published with it. 
  5. Signatures. Each Member participating in the case shall sign the Judgment. A Member dissenting may write next to his/her name “Dissenting,” and a Member with a concurring opinion may write next to his/ her name “Concurring.” 
  6. Nature of Judgments. Judgments shall be final and without appeal. 
  7. Service of Judgment and Publication. The Executive Secretary shall promptly serve upon each Party a copy of the Final Judgment and publish the Judgment on the Tribunal Website. 
  8. Archiving. The original Judgment with original signatures shall be attested by the Executive Secretary and filed in Respondent’s archives.
Article 16: Post-Judgment Actions
  1. Correction of Errors. Arithmetical and clerical errors in the Judgment or those arising from any oversight or omission may be corrected by the Tribunal, on its own initiative or at the request of one of the Parties. The Parties shall have 30 days to request corrections from the date they are notified of the Judgment. In no case may corrections alter or modify the decision set out in the Judgment. 
  2. Alternative Compensation. If Respondent’s Chief Executive6 determines that rescission or specific performance ordered in a Judgment is not practicable or not in Respondent’s best interests, Respondent shall petition the Tribunal in writing within 30 days of notification of the Judgment, to fix the amount of compensation to be awarded to Complainant in lieu of rescission or specific performance. Having heard the other Party or Parties, the Presiding Member will convene the Tribunal or the Panel to decide on Respondent’s request. 
  3. Compliance. Within 90 days of the date of notification of the Judgment or other decision, unless a different time limit is specified in the Judgment or in the Statute or Rules of Procedure, each Party shall carry out the corresponding actions ordered by the Tribunal and shall, on or before the expiration of that period, notify the Tribunal and the other Party or Parties in writing of the actions taken. 
  4. Procedure for Disputes on Compliance
a. If following the issuance of a Judgment, a dispute arises between the Parties regarding compliance with the Judgment, either Party within 120 days of the service of the Judgment under Article 15(7), may petition the Tribunal to resolve that dispute.

b. The Petition shall state the material facts, identify the specific failure of compliance relied upon, and clearly present the Party’s position in this regard.

c. Within seven days following receipt of the Petition, the Secretariat shall send a copy to the adverse Party, who shall have 14 days within which to respond to the Petition.

d. The Tribunal shall consider the Petition and the Response, together with any evidence or submissions it has received from the Parties, and issue a decision.
 
  1. Request for Revision Based on Discovery of New Evidence.
a. New Evidence. Any of the Parties may request revision of a Judgment issued by the Tribunal, in the event that a fact or a document is brought to the attention of the Tribunal and which by its nature might have had a decisive influence on the Judgment and which at the time of the Judgment was unknown to the Tribunal and to the Party making the application for the revision, provided such lack of knowledge was not due to fault or deceit by that Party.

b. Deadline. Revision shall be requested within 30 days from the date the fact or document is discovered and, in any event, within one year from the date that notice of the Judgment was given to the Party making the request.

c. Procedure. The procedure for revision shall be, mutatis mutandis, the one set out in Articles 6 to 15

6 The Chief Executive of the Inter-American Development Bank is its President; the Chief Executive of the IDB Invest is its General Manager.

Article 17: Third Party Intervention
  1. Voluntary Intervention. Any employee to whom the Tribunal is open under the last clause of Article II(1) of the Statute may apply to intervene in a case being heard by the Tribunal, regardless of the stage of the proceedings, if the employee believes that his/her rights may be affected by the Judgment. 
  2. Requirements. The request for intervention shall meet mutatis mutandis the requirements of Article 6. 
  3. Third Party Notification. Any person whose rights might be affected by the Judgment may be called upon to intervene in the proceedings, either at the request of a Party or on the initiative of the President. 
  4. Procedure. The Executive Secretary shall make the Presiding Member’s ruling, or the request known to the Parties, who shall have 10 days to comment. Thereafter, the Presiding Member shall issue a final ruling regarding the intervention, which shall be transmitted to the requesting person and the Parties. If the Presiding Member should admit the intervention, the intervener shall be provided with a full copy of the record of the case to that date, will be given notice of all briefs submitted and all rulings issued thereafter, may present evidence under Article 13, and may take part in the Oral Argument under Article 14(2).
Article 18: Confidentiality
  1. Utilization of briefs. Briefs and their annexes submitted to the Tribunal are for the exclusive use of the Tribunal and the Parties in that specific case. 
  2. Confidential Information. When the Parties provide information which they regard as confidential, they shall specifically inform the Executive Secretary. The Presiding Member, having consulted the other Members or Panel, shall determine whether the information so submitted can be regarded as being confidential. The Executive Secretary shall safeguard this evidence and shall make a record of it in the case file. The Parties may examine this evidence only in the office of the Secretariat. If one of the Parties considers that certain information is so confidential that it ought not to be disclosed to the other Parties, the Presiding Member will require that such information be submitted for his/her sole inspection and decide upon its disclosure.
Article 19: Anonymity
  1. Anonymity. A Complainant who wishes that his/her name not appear in the documents that the Tribunal publishes may request anonymity at the time when the Complaint is filed with the Tribunal or at any time before the case is listed for decision by the Tribunal. Immediately thereafter the request for anonymity shall be transmitted to Respondent for comment within a period of time determined by the Presiding Member.
  2. Authorization. The Presiding Member in consultation with the Panel may grant a request for anonymity in cases in which publication of Complainant’s name is likely to be seriously prejudicial to Complainant. 
  3. Denial of Anonymity. If the Presiding Member should decide against granting anonymity, Complainant shall inform the Executive Secretary, within 30 days of receiving notification of the President’s decision, whether he/she is maintaining or withdrawing the Complaint.
Article 20: Joinder and Separation
  1. Joinder of Cases. If the issues of fact and of law coincide in separate cases, the President, motu proprio or at the request of a Party, may order the joinder of the cases. 
  2. Separation of Cases and Scope of Evidence. In those cases in which several Complainants file a joint Complaint, the President may, notwithstanding, order the separation of the cases when their joint processing would be undesirable, on account of diverse circumstances of fact or of law. The President may also rule that all or part of the evidence produced in one of the cases be valid for the remaining cases.
Article 21: Time Limits
  1. Suspension of Time Limits. In any case, and particularly in a case involving the protected categories referred to in Article IX(5) of the Statute, the Tribunal may decide to suspend the application of the provisions regarding time limits. 
  2. Computation of Time Limits. In computing the time periods specified in these Rules all calendar days shall be counted. If the expiration of a time period falls on a non-business day at Respondent’s headquarters, or at the location of Respondent’s other office where a filing or other proceeding is to take place, the time period shall be extended to the next working day at such office.
Article 22: Languages
  1. Working Languages. The working languages of the Tribunal shall be Spanish and English. However, when Complainant requests that the proceedings be conducted in one of Respondent’s other official languages, the Tribunal may agree to the use of that language in written and oral proceedings. 
  2. Language of Judgments. Judgments shall be issued in Spanish and English. However, when appropriate, the Tribunal may instruct the Executive Secretary to have a particular Judgment issued in one of Respondent’s other official languages. 
  3. Extension of Time Limits for Translation. The time limits of these Rules may be extended by the Executive Secretary when there are documents that need to be translated.
Article 23: Notice
  1. Notices. Notice shall be given: personally; through Respondent’s mail system; via messenger; electronically via email; or via certified mail. Whenever Respondent’s General Counsel or another attorney appointed by Respondent is to be notified in person, it shall suffice for the notice to be delivered to a responsible official authorized to receive service at his/her office. The Executive Secretary shall require from the Parties acknowledgment of receipt of all notices delivered by electronic means and shall record in the case file the date on which the notifications were received. 
  2. Effect of Notice to Counsel. Notice given to the representative or to the lawyer of a Party shall be regarded as having been given to the Party itself.
Article 24: Amicus Curiae

The Tribunal may permit any person or entity with a substantial interest in the outcome of the case to participate as a “friend-of-the-court,” including Respondent’s Staff Association.

Article 25: General Provisions
  1. Electronic Filings. All filings before the Tribunal shall be electronic in PDF or Word format, and signatures shall be electronic. 
  2. Communications from the Parties. All communications to the Members from the Parties, directly or indirectly connected with cases being heard by the Tribunal, shall be channeled through the Executive Secretary. 
  3. Recordings. The term “recording” as used in these Rules of Procedure refers exclusively to any audio and visual recording of a Hearing, the Oral Closing Argument, or any other oral evidentiary proceeding ordered under Article 13. It does not include written notes, or the written transcripts produced by a court reporter, a Member, or by the Secretariat. Unless the President otherwise orders, the Executive Secretary, shall destroy all recordings made pursuant to these Rules within 30 days following the issuance of the corresponding final Judgment. 
  4. Electronic Signatures of Members of the Tribunal. Upon the request of the Executive Secretary, any orders or other documents requiring the signature of a Member and with which a Member agrees shall be by electronic signature. In each case an electronic signature is requested, the Executive Secretary shall first confirm by way of email or any other recordable means the Member’s agreement to the content of the order or document to be signed, and that confirmation shall be maintained in the Tribunal’s archives. 
  5. Matters Not Specifically Provided For. Any issue or circumstance which may arise and which is not specifically provided for in these Rules, shall be decided by the Tribunal or the Panel, in each particular case. 
  6. Amendment of the Rules. These Rules may be amended by the Tribunal with the affirmative vote of at least four of its Members. 
  7. Entry into force. These Rules and any modifications and amendments hereto shall enter into force on the date established in the Tribunal resolution approving them, and they shall apply to all complaints filed after that date. No later than seven days following the adoption of the corresponding resolution, the Executive Secretary shall publish the resolution, together with the Rules modifications, and amendments so approved, on the Tribunal’s Website.
Remove background color
Off
Narrow
0
Back to top
Rules of Procedure of the Administrative Tribunal
Download the PDF here
File a Complaint

Discover our mechanisms for ensuring good practices and how to contact us regarding ethics and integrity matters at the IDB.

See more
Transparency

Learn about our comprehensive approach to transparency and accountability. 

See more
Jump back to top