The Respondent Firm (“Respondent”) was a member of a consortium, which participated in multiple bidding processes under the Innovation in School Infrastructure Program in Panama (the “Program”) and was awarded two construction contracts. The Office of Institutional Integrity (“OII”) submitted a Statement of Charges and Evidence against the Respondent for allegedly engaging in fraudulent and corrupt practices related to the Program.

The Respondent Firm (“Respondent”) was a member of a consortium, which participated in multiple bidding processes under the Innovation in School Infrastructure Program in Panama (the “Program”) and was awarded two construction contracts. The Office of Institutional Integrity (“OII”) submitted a Statement of Charges and Evidence against the Respondent for allegedly engaging in fraudulent and corrupt practices related to the Program.

The Office of Institutional Integrity submitted a Statement of Charges and Evidence (“Statement of Charges”) against a principal respondent firm (“Principal Respondent”) for allegedly engaging in fraudulent and corrupt practices related to the Innovation in School Infrastructure Program. The Sanctions Officer (“SO”) determined that it is more likely than not that the Principal Respondent engaged in fraudulent and corrupt practices.

The Respondent Firm (“Respondent”) acted as an agent for several bidders who submitted offers in multiple bidding processes under the Innovation in School Infrastructure Program in Panama (the “Program”). The Office of Institutional Integrity (“OII”) submitted a Statement of Charges and Evidence against the Respondent for allegedly engaging in fraudulent and corrupt practices related to the Program.