Synopses
Code
PA
The Office of Institutional Integrity (“OII”) submitted a Statement of Charges and Evidence against a Firm Respondent (“Principal Respondent”) for allegedly engaging in corrupt and fraudulent practices related to the following programs: (i) Program to Improve Equity and Strengthen Health Services and (ii) Program to Strengthen Results-Based Management in the Health Sector (the “Programs"). OII identified one firm (“Respondent Firm”) that was under control of the sanctioned Principal Respondent.
The Respondent represented a firm that provided external technical audit related to the Program to Improve the Equity and Strengthen Health Services (the “Program").
The Respondent was awarded two contracts to deliver external technical audit services for the following programs: (i) Program to Improve Equity and Strengthen Health Services and (ii) Program to Strengthen Results-Based Management in the Health Sector (the “Programs")
The Respondent (the "Respondent"), acting as an employee of the company that operates the Inter-American Development Bank's (the "Bank" or "IDB") Service Center, was responsible for the execution of corporate procurement processes under a construction agreement for the expansion and renovation of the Bank's offices in the Republic of Panama (the "Agreement"). The Respondent was required to comply with the Bank's Corporate Procurement Policies in the performance of her duties under the employment agreement.
The Respondent, through firms, provided advisory and consulting services in infrastructure projects to companies that submitted bids in the context of the Program for the Innovation in School Infrastructure (the "Program").
The Respondent Firm served as the conduit through which the Respondent’s representatives provided advisory and consulting services in infrastructure projects to companies that submitted bids in the Program for the Innovation in School Infrastructure (the "Program").
The Respondent, through firms, provided advisory and consulting services in infrastructure projects to companies that submitted bids in the Program for the Innovation in School Infrastructure (the "Program").
The Office of Institutional Integrity submitted a Statement of Charges and Evidence against two respondent firms who were members of a consortium for allegedly engaging in fraudulent practices related to the Innovation in School Infrastructure Program. The Sanctions Officer (“SO”) determined that it is more likely than not that the respondent firms engaged in fraudulent practices.
The Office of Institutional Integrity submitted a Statement of Charges and Evidence against two respondent firms who were members of a consortium for allegedly engaging in fraudulent practices related to the Innovation in School Infrastructure Program. The Sanctions Officer (“SO”) determined that it is more likely than not that the respondent firms engaged in fraudulent practices.