The Individual Respondent (“Respondent”) participated in the First Natural Disaster Risk Prevention and Mitigation Project (the “Program”). The Office of Institutional Integrity (“OII”) submitted a Statement of Charges and Evidence against the Respondent for allegedly engaging in a fraudulent practice related to the Program. OII accused the Respondent of misrepresenting information related to the verification of compliance with technical specifications by the contractor during implementation to obtain a financial benefit.
The Respondent Firm (“Respondent”) participated in a bidding process under the First Natural Disaster Risk Prevention and Mitigation Project (the “Program”). The Office of Institutional Integrity (“OII”) submitted a Statement of Charges and Evidence against the Respondent for allegedly engaging in fraudulent practices related to the Program. OII accused the Respondent of misrepresenting information in order to meet the requirements established in the bidding documents and qualify for the award of a works contract.
The Individual Respondent (“Respondent”) was acting as the legal representative of a company which participated in a bidding process under the First Natural Disaster Risk Prevention and Mitigation Project (the “Program”). The Office of Institutional Integrity (“OII”) submitted a Statement of Charges and Evidence against the Respondent for allegedly engaging in fraudulent practices related to the Program. OII accused the Respondent of misrepresenting information in order to meet the requirements established in the bidding documents and qualify for the award of a works contract.
The Office of Institutional Integrity (“OII”) submitted a Statement of Charges and Evidence against an Individual Respondent (“Principal Respondent”) for allegedly engaging in a collusive practice related to the Program for Rural Sanitation and Water (the “Program”). OII identified one firm (“Respondent Firm”) that was under control of the sanctioned Principal Respondent.
The Office of Institutional Integrity (“OII”) submitted a Statement of Charges and Evidence against an Individual Respondent (“Principal Respondent”) for allegedly engaging in a collusive practice related to the Program for Rural Sanitation and Water (the “Program”). OII identified one firm (“Respondent Firm”) that was under control of the sanctioned Principal Respondent.
The Respondent submitted one bid for the Program for Rural Sanitation and Water (the "Program") but the contract was awarded to another respondent.
The Respondent submitted three bids for the Program for Rural Sanitation and Water (the "Program") and was awarded one contract.
The Respondent submitted bids for the Program for Rural Sanitation and Water (the "Program") and was awarded two contracts.
The Office of Institutional Integrity submitted a Statement of Charges and Evidence against a principal respondent firm for allegedly engaging in collusive practices related to the Rural Potable Water Program. The Sanctions Officer (“SO”) determined that it is more likely than not that the principal respondent firm engaged in collusive practices.
The Office of Institutional Integrity submitted a Statement of Charges and Evidence against a principal individual respondent for allegedly engaging in collusive practices related to the Rural Potable Water Program. The Sanctions Officer (“SO”) determined that it is more likely than not that the individual respondent engaged in collusive practices.