The Individual Respondent (“Respondent”) was a consultant in the Employment Support Program (“Program”). The Office of Institutional Integrity (“OII”) submitted a Statement of Charges and Evidence against the Respondent for allegedly engaging in fraudulent and corrupt practices related to the Program. OII accused the Respondent of submitting false pension contribution receipts to appear compliant with the consulting contracts and receive his professional fees.
Code
BO
The Individual Respondent (“Respondent”), acting as the owner and legal representative of a Sole Proprietorship, participated in three price comparison processes within the framework of the Lake Titicaca Sanitation Program and the Periurban Water and Sewerage Program Phase I and Complementary Financing (“Programs”). The Office of Institutional Integrity (“OII”) submitted a Statement of Charges and Evidence against the Respondent for allegedly engaging in fraudulent practices related to the Programs.
The Respondent Sole Proprietorship (“Respondent”), acting through its owner, participated in three price comparison processes within the framework of the Lake Titicaca Sanitation Program and the Periurban Water and Sewerage Program Phase I and Complementary Financing (“Programs”). The Office of Institutional Integrity (“OII”) submitted a Statement of Charges and Evidence against the Respondent for allegedly engaging in fraudulent practices related to the Programs.
The Office of Institutional Integrity submitted a Statement of Charges and Evidence against a respondent firm and an individual respondent (the “Respondents”) for allegedly engaging in fraudulent practices in relation to the Multipurpose Drinking Water and Irrigation Program for the Municipalities of Batallas, Pucarani and El Alto. The Sanctions Officer (“SO”) determined that it is more likely than not that the Respondents engaged in fraudulent practices.
The Office of Institutional Integrity submitted a Statement of Charges and Evidence against a respondent firm and an individual respondent (the “Respondents”) for allegedly engaging in fraudulent practices in relation to the Multipurpose Drinking Water and Irrigation Program for the Municipalities of Batallas, Pucarani and El Alto. The Sanctions Officer (“SO”) determined that it is more likely than not that the Respondents engaged in fraudulent practices.
The Office of Institutional Integrity submitted a Statement of Charges and Evidence against a respondent firm and an individual respondent (the “Respondents”) for allegedly engaging in fraudulent practices in relation to the Multipurpose Drinking Water and Irrigation Program for the Municipalities of Batallas, Pucarani and El Alto. The Sanctions Officer (“SO”) determined that it is more likely than not that the Respondents engaged in fraudulent practices.
The Individual Respondent (“Respondent”) represented a company that was a member of a consortium, which participated in a bidding process carried out under the Multipurpose Drinking Water and Irrigation Program for the Municipalities of Batallas, Pucarani and El Alto (the “Program”). The Office of Institutional Integrity (“OII”) submitted a Statement of Charges and Evidence against the Respondent for allegedly engaging in a fraudulent practice related to the Program.
The Respondent Firm (“Respondent”) was a member of a consortium, which participated in a bidding process carried out under the Multipurpose Drinking Water and Irrigation Program for the Municipalities of Batallas, Pucarani and El Alto (the “Program”). The Office of Institutional Integrity (“OII”) submitted a Statement of Charges and Evidence against the Respondent for allegedly engaging in a fraudulent practice related to the Program.