Tab 1. Getting Started Tab 1.3  What approaches can be taken to early childhood development?



This section presents six complementary approaches to improving early childhood development that might be considered in designing an ECCD strategy and project. In an ideal world all these approaches would be applied together, because they all address conditions in children's environment while working at different levels. A project might focus on one of these approaches that is not being adequately carried out—or on several—while recognizing and perhaps strengthening the others. For example, a project might apply one of the first two approaches, focusing on the child or on the family, doing so within the context of the community. It might provide complementary institutional support to the government entities or nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) responsible for the project. And it might seek changes in the legal, policy, and regulatory framework necessary to allow the strategy to work, while also gathering and disseminating knowledge to strengthen awareness of and demand for ECCD programs.

Attending to children in centers
This direct, center-based approach focusing on children is aimed at enhancing their development and learning by attending to their immediate needs in centers organized outside the home (see box 1.4). These centers serve as alternative environments for both care and development. A center-based approach can involve formal or nonformal preschools, child care centers and crèches, home day care arrangements in which one person cares for several children in her home, cooperative programs and play groups, or programs for pregnant mothers and young children carried out through health centers.

Supporting and educating family caregivers
This approach focuses on educating and enabling parents and other family members in ways that improve their care for and interaction with the child. Family members are part of a child's social and emotional environment and also are responsible for arranging the physical environment that affects a child's development. Family caregivers can be educated through home visiting programs, adult education courses, child-to-child programs, the mass media, a general community development strategy, or nutrition, health, or literacy programs.

Promoting child-centered community development
This approach emphasizes working to change community conditions that may adversely affect child development. It adopts the welfare of children as an entry point to foster community initiative, organization, and participation in a range of related activities aimed at improving the physical environment and the knowledge and practices of community members. The goal is to strengthen the organizational base, allowing common action and empowering the community. These activities benefit children but also the broader community.

Strengthening institutional resources and capacities
The many institutions—governmental and civic—involved in the early childhood field need adequate financial, material, and human resources to do a proper job. This approach focuses on strengthening their resources through such activities as institution building, training, provision of materials, or experimentation with innovative techniques and models.

Strengthening national commitment
National commitment is expressed in the legal, regulatory, and policy frameworks relating to young children and families and in the processes for planning and implementing programs. This commitment can be strengthened through such activities as reforming the national constitution, passing new laws, establishing national committees, and incorporating an early childhood dimension into regular planning processes.

Strengthening demand and awareness
This approach concentrates on producing and distributing knowledge to create broad awareness of and demand for ECCD programs and to promote social participation. It is directed toward influencing the broad cultural ethos that affects child development.

Box 1.4  Center-based and family education approaches: Advantages and caveats

Attending to children in centers

Advantages

  • Centers provide a recognized space for children in communities. They can serve as rallying places for parents and community members to act for children. They provide visibility that may be politically advantageous.
  • Grouping children facilitates protection, health care, and nutritional monitoring.
  • Direct attention provided in a center can ensure that a child receives essential elements of care.
  • For children aged three to six, centers provide a kind of social interaction that they need and that is not available in many homes.
  • Center-based care can free mothers and other caregivers to earn and learn.

Caveats

  • Attention outside the home can result in conflicts between the home and the alternative environment (at an individual level or in the values promoted). Centers should therefore seek to involve parents, both to make cultural accommodations and to socialize parents (see below).
  • In some cases families abrogate responsibility to the center.
  • Grouping children can increase the chances of exposure to communicable diseases.

Educating parents and other family members

Advantages

  • All family members can benefit, not just particular children.
  • Family responsibility can be reinforced.
  • Existing programs of care and development can be better utilized if they include parental education.
  • Improvements in child development are more likely to be sustained.
  • An integrated approach (incorporating health, nutrition, and education) can be fostered because there is little need to integrate programming across sectoral lines.
  • Broad coverage can be achieved at relatively low cost.

Caveats

  • To be effective, parental education should be timely.
  • Education and support must be culturally appropriate, reinforcing people's positive knowledge while adding to it.
  • To be most effective, the process of transferring knowledge must provide for interpersonal exchange in groups and for mutual support.
  • Parental education is no panacea, but one of several complementary strategies.