EVALUATION OFFICE REPORTS - REs

RE-201
Evaluation Report
Annual Report of the Evaluation Office for 1994


Appendix 5

THE STRUCTURE OF THE LOGICAL FRAMEWORK

 

  OBJECTIVES

INDICATORS

MEANS OF VERIFICATION

ASSUMPTIONS

GOAL

The Goal is a statement of how the project or program will contribute to the solution of the problem (or problems) of the sector.

 

 

The indicators at Goal level describe how the overall impact of the project shall be measured. They are specific in terms of quantity, quality, and time (target group and location if relevant).

 

The means of verification are the sources of information that an evaluator can use to verify that the targets were achieved. They can include published material, visual inspection, sample surveys, etc.

 

The assumptions indicate the important events, conditions, or decisions necessary for sustaining the Goal in the long run.

PURPOSE

The Purpose is a statement of the direct impact or result to be obtained from using the Outputs produced with the project. It is a hypothesis about what the project will achieve.

 

 

The indicators at the Purpose level describe how the direct impact of the project shall be measured. They should include targets reflecting the end of project status (EOPS). They are specific in terms of quantity, quality, and time (target group and location if relevant).

 

 

The means of verification are the sources that the executor and evaluator can consult to see if the targets are being achieved. They can indicate that there is a problem and suggest the need for changes in project Outputs. They can include published material, visual inspection, sample surveys, etc.

 

The assumptions indicate the events, conditions, or decisions that are outside the control of the project manager (risks) that have to occur for the project to achieve the Goal.

OUTPUTS

These are the goods, services, and training that the project executor is required by contract to complete. They should be expressed as work completed (systems installed, people trained, etc.).

 

The indicators for Outputs are succinct, but clear, descriptions of each of the Outputs that has to be completed during execution. Each should specify quantity, quality and timing of the goods, services, etc. to be delivered. They are specific in terms of quantity, quality, and time (target group and location if relevant).

 

This cell tells where an evaluator can find the sources of information to verify that the things that have been contracted for have been delivered. Sources can include site inspection, auditor's reports, etc.

The assumptions are the events, conditions, or decisions (outside the control of the project manager) that have to occur in order that the Outputs will achieve the Purpose for which they were undertaken.

ACTIVITIES

These are the tasks that the executor must carry out in order to produce each of the Outputs. Activities are listed in chronological order for each Output. The activities are those that will be performed by the executing unit.

 

This cell contains the budget for each Output.

 

This cell tells where an evaluator can obtain information on whether the budget was spent as planned. It is usually the accounting records of the executing unit.

 

The assumptions are the events, conditions, or decisions (outside the control of the project manager) that have to occur in order to complete the Outputs.